Race politics: Racializing Islam and seeing beyond stereotypes

DEARBORN— In today’s political climate, many people overlook the difference between the “religious” and the “fanatical”, as the media often hastily interlaces those terms when it comes to Islam.

Western media have regularly designated persons who allegedly follow Islam and have committed atrocious crimes as Muslims in headlines, while criminals and terrorists who follow other faiths are not branded by their religions.

This has evidently led Westerners to believe devout Muslims are indistinguishable from the fanatics who claim to follow that religion. It’s a false equivalency not unlike comparing a devout Christian to a member of the Ku Klux Klan.

The spike in hate crimes and rhetoric against Muslims in America during and after President Trump’s election speaks for itself; and now— just days after his inauguration— it continues to escalate.

Mosques and innocent Muslims have been and continue to be attacked for being faithful.

“The clear difference”

A religious individual is defined as one who shows deep religious feelings or commitment, while a person filled with extreme and tenacious zeal is a fanatic— stepping outside the boundary of any religion he or she claims to follow.

Sheikh Ibrahim Kazerooni of the Islamic Center of America said Islam has rejected any type of extremism.

“If the essence of all religion, according to the deliberation of the Quran, is social justice and love for everyone and compassion, anyone who steps outside the boundary is considered to be an extremist,” he said.

He added that the Quran says faith cannot be imposed and that it commands Muslims to be compassionate and merciful, so anyone who steps outside of this principle is extreme.

“The way you communicate with people should be in the best possible way,” he said. “Even in your conversation, you have to be respectful.”

Dawud Walid, executive director of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-MI), agrees.

“People of all religions or creeds have a bell curve,” he said. “Meaning that the masses of the people are in the middle and then there are people who are on the extreme frenzies of both the right and the left. That is not something that is just particular to Islam; there are extremists who are Buddhists, Christians and others.”

He said extremists overlook the understanding of religion.

“The one who is far to the right and extreme in terms of violence is someone who has missed the normative understanding of Islamic theology,” he said. “The Quran is very clear that whoever kills an innocent person, it’s as if they killed all of humankind; and the Quran commands [Muslims] not to kill an innocent soul that God has made sacred.”

“Racial politics and the Islamophobia industry”

Kazerooni said the first thing Muslims need to do collectively is escape the discourse that the “Islamophobia industry” is imposing on them as a way to box them.

“The notion that we should somehow comply with it or use those narratives have to be rejected, first,” he said. “So that we can free ourselves in defining the parameters for the discussion under conversation. Otherwise, we will be bound and boxed into a corner and then we have no other alternative than to discuss this ‘either or.’…This notion of the industry defining ‘Islam’ as evil and ‘Muslim’ as the enemy has to be dealt with not within the parameters they define, but totally free outside.”

He said the idea of dichotomy— making it clear that there are good Muslims and bad ones— is nothing new. He pointed out that in the past, this was applied to people of other races and religion— going back to the Puritan times.

“Nothing has changed,” he said, adding that just as the Puritans did, some Americans today appropriate a number of Biblical narratives to identify somebody as an enemy and somebody else as a friend.

Walid added that America has always racialized religion.

“As the founders of America were White Protestants, Islam has never been seen as truly American or White enough as a religion,” he said. “Therefore, the KKK and radical people in the Christian identity movement are never talked about as being Christian, though they are avowedly Christian in their hatred.”

He said it’s not the case for Islam because it has to do with the race politics that has always defined this country.

Kazerooni said a “colonial mindset” looks at Muslims as the enemy. He said a number of steps are being taken, including conflating 1.5 billion people with individuals who have committed acts of evil.

“We really must step away from what we call parameters or boxes that the outside world define for us and box us into so that we cannot move out,” he emphasized. “It’s either or; either we have to say we are good Muslims or other people are bad Muslims, which is contradictory to the basic tenants of Islam.”

He said the coherent answer to this question is that “faith by itself is neutral.” However, when a person practices it and applies the principles of the faith outside, that shows whether that individual is fulfilling the goals of the faith— regardless of who the person is or the religious affiliation.


By Zahraa Farhat | The Arab American News | Friday, 01.27.2017, 12:12 AM


Identity Politics: Denying and distorting Arab women’s experiences

                                                     Illustration by Luis Vazquez

DEARBORN — Arab women have reached the summit of their education and careers, yet one perception prevails in many Westerners’ minds— “They are oppressed.”

According to Arab American women, no one answers the question, “Who said so?” rationally or allows them to speak for themselves. Instead, Westerners use the news as their pivotal comeback.

In her March 2002 “Monthly Review” article, “Understanding the Other Sister: The Case of Arab Feminism”, Susan Muaddi Darraj, a Palestinian American associate professor of English at Harford Community College in Bel Air, Maryland and lecturer at Johns Hopkins University’s masters in writing program, explained that “Arab women’s voices are excluded from discussions concerning their own lives” frequently “and they are to be ‘informed’ about feminism, as if it is an ideology exclusive to American women alone.”

With their fixed coverage on allegedly oppressed Arab women, the mainstream media have negatively impacted Western civilization’s view of Arabs’ ethnicity and specifically one religion— Islam— that not all Arabs follow. In addition, Westerners speak on behalf of all “Arab women” without permission, as if having shared their experiences.

Such discussions ultimately play a role in how the world views the Arab woman’s experience.

False absolutes and denying “The Arab woman’s experience”

Not all Arabs are Muslims and not all Muslims are Arabs, but they always seem to be mistakenly intertwined. Also, not all Arab or Muslim women wear the hijab.

According to Randa Kattan, CEO of the Arab Australia Council, Arab women’s experiences vary.

“When we stereotype and overlook the rich and diverse experiences of people, we come up with one-size-fits-all technical solutions that buy into the ‘them’ and ‘us’ rhetoric,” the Lebanese Christian wrote in an opinion piece for The Guardian. “As such, we limit our ability to truly engage and connect with people, especially women and girls from vulnerable communities. We limit our ability to provide them with the relevant support and assistance they require to fully participate in society. And the cycle of oppression and isolation will go on.”

Kattan’s article suggests that denying the Arab woman’s experience, in itself, subjugates and segregates her.

Hiba, a 20-year-old psychology major and criminal justice minor at Wayne State University, said she chose to wear the hijab at 9-years-old because she wanted to, not because she was oppressed.

“I’d rather speak for myself,” Hiba said, referring to feminists who do not include her or other Arab women in the dialogue. “I wore the hijab when I turned 9-years-old by choice. No one forced me to.”

She said feminists cannot speak for all Arab women, just as she cannot speak for all Whites.

“They’ve never really experienced what I’ve experienced,” she said. “And I’ve never experienced what they have as [part of the majority]. They get all of their privileges and I don’t get that as an Arab Muslim hijabi.”

She said Islam does not allow oppression, but there are oppressive people everywhere in the world who follow different religions and belong to various ethnic groups. She also does not deny that there are oppressive men in her own community, but that doesn’t mean all Arab women are oppressed.

“There’s a slim percentage of oppressed women in our community,” she said. “But with the media, the slim percentage becomes the majority.”

Zahra, a 21-year-old nursing student, said unjust people’s actions don’t define either an entire religion or an ethnicity.

She added that there are numerous oppressed women around the world and that not all of them are Arabs or Muslims.

“I’ve never been forced to do anything,” she said. “I’ve been a Muslim all my life and decided to wear [the hijab] three years ago when I had the choice not to. It’s one of the most liberating things I’ve ever done in my life.”

She explained that most classmates just assume she was forced to wear the hijab until they ask.

“They get shocked when they find out,” she said. “And, I usually go on and talk about how my mother, aunts and cousins had a choice, too. It almost feels like you have to prove a point that ‘Not all Arab women are oppressed.'”

“Arab women and Islam”

Before Islam, women in the Arab world during the seventh century lacked rights, according to Islamic scholars and a PBS.org article entitled “Muhammad and women”, which breaks the stereotypes of today’s misinterpretations that revolve around the religion many Arabs follow.

“Even the right of life could be in question, since it was not uncommon for small girls to be buried alive during times of scarcity,” the article said. “In the Qur’an, it is said that on Judgment Day ‘buried girls’ will rise out of their graves and ask for what crime they were killed. Part of Muhammad’s legacy was to end infanticide and establish explicit rights for women.”

The article added that Islam presents women and men as equal before God.

“It grants women divinely sanctioned inheritance, property, social and marriage rights, including the right to reject the terms of a proposal and to initiate divorce,” it said. “The American middle-class trend to include a prenuptial agreement in the marriage contract is completely acceptable in Islamic law.”

According to the article, women in some countries can’t initiate divorce because of patriarchal rules, not because of Islamic principles. It also said the Prophet repeatedly counseled Muslim men to treat their wives and daughters well.

“‘You have rights over your women,'” he said. “‘And your women have rights over you.'”

Recent Arab feminist moves and identity politics

Diana Alghoul, a London based journalist and political analyst, recently wrote a piece called “White saviors must stop speaking over Arab women” for the Middle East Monitor about the viral Saudi Arabian music video “Hwages” that came out last month as a feminist anthem demanding Saudi women’s rights.

“When Islamophobic figures like Tommy Robinson or Katie Hopkins sensationalize the Saudi women’s cause, they are doing it through the lens of identity politics,” she wrote. “They do not interpret Saudi women campaigning for social and legal reformation as Saudi women who demand their rights, but as women who are leaning towards the Western way of life. Muslim and Arab women campaigners are erased of their Muslim and Arab identity and are portrayed to be working against their religious and cultural identity, rather than the system in which they live.”

Alghoul also explained in the piece that the new “Real Housewives of ISIS” comedy sketch produced by the BBC depicted the cases of British women joining ISIS in an over generalized way to serve the mainstream discussions of men oppressing women in Islam, which is the religion most Westerners think ISIS follows. She added that the sketch disregards “key factors” like “the online grooming of vulnerable underage girls, mental health and poverty” that may have led them to join.

Some of The AANews’ followers did not find the skit funny, expressing their frustration after watching the video on our Facebook page.

“Try telling that to your typical American who believes ISIS is typical Muslims and we’re all the exceptions,” Yasmine Rukia Badaoui commented on Facebook in reply to another person, who said it is known ISIS are not Muslims.

“I’m a Muslim who definitely hates ISIS,” Rica Alkurdi added. “We just don’t need more stereotypes about Muslim women. Enough is enough I guess…. Go out to the real world and learn who we are. We are not oppressed; we are given rights that most women dreamed of years ago.”

By Zahraa Farhat | The Arab American News | Thursday, 01.12.2017, 10:13 PM

The importance of bridging cultures in the classroom

Illustration by Rafael López.

DEARBORN — Multiculturalism in classrooms has become far more necessary, not only as a means of understanding among different cultures, but also as a possible shelter from any identity crisis a child could face.

The 2016 election’s outcome— which included spikes in racism and hate— has caused minority parents to worry for their children’s wellbeing, mainly in schools, where they are not around.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, more than half of the nation’s children, all younger than 18-years-old, are predicted to be part of a minority group by the year 2020.

Therefore, the young need to feel comfortable and safe in school settings where they spend most of their days.

A Pacific Standard article entitled “Racism 101: Let’s Talk About Diversity and Prejudice in America’s Public Schools,” published two years ago, stated that all schools need to embrace “straight talk about racism; the recruitment and hiring of more teachers and administrators of color; curricula in which the work of racially-diverse authors…are central.”

The proposal falls into agreement with Dr. Amira Kassem’s outlook on English education.

“Teaching is a political act,” she told The AANews. “And, curriculum is policy enacted.”

Teaching: “The political act”

Kassem, a Dearborn Public Schools teacher since 1991 and an adjunct professor of English curriculum and instruction at Wayne State University, explained the importance of discussing mixed observations in the classroom.

“Diverse perspectives form the core of a pluralistic world,” she said. “Especially in schools— which are theoretically the playgrounds of ideas— all perspectives should be included and discussed. It is not enough to consider what to read with our students or to settle for including multicultural books.”

She said “how to read a text” is just as central and added that the educator is held responsible to analyze the “White, middle aged male perspective” for the views his texts lack. Thus, the teacher must bring them to the table.

Kassem also described interrogation as critical to supporting different viewpoints.

“You have the responsibility to interrogate the text for those absent perspectives and bring them to bear on any discussion of that text,” she said. “The interrogation of the text— any text— is crucial to empower and accommodate other perspectives. Simply providing diverse texts can be a tokenism of a sort— to appease rather than call into question a dominant narrative.”

Curriculum: “The enacted policy”

As for teaching multicultural literature, Kassem said it should be a norm.  But it’s not, especially since it’s still a constant discussion.

However, she pointed out that teachers can diversify the curriculum just by allowing students to bring their cultures and customs into the classroom.

According to the 2012 book “Infusing Diversity & Cultural Competence into Teacher Education” by Aaron Thompson and Joseph B. Cuseo, the current curriculum, also known as the “traditional, Eurocentric, male-centered curriculum”, disregards “the contributions and perspective of non-dominant groups” and “fails to validate the culture of minority groups”, which can segregate them even more from a school culture that contrasts significantly from their own culture.

Therefore, as Kassem suggested, interlacing the curriculum with diversity in the classroom— by making room for analysis and discussion— encourages students to see through multiple lenses, not just their own.

“Bridging cultures and diverse literature”

Kassem said discrimination starts within picture books, where publishers overwhelm the public with statements regarding their obligation to multiculturalism. She said they claim superficially their intent to produce more opportunities for children to comprehend their own worlds.

“But they are really not there,” she said. “And, even when they are, schools, under curricula committees, take too long to find them.”

Consequently, Kassem said it is necessary for both the minority and majority students to bridge cultures.

“The bridges must be built on both sides and crossed simultaneously,” she said. “White kids need multicultural literature just as much, for they too often live in a dominant narrative that does not help them navigate others’ maps.”

Kassem said Arab American students living in Dearborn are not sheltered from the possible identity crisis that may result if unable to bridge cultures. She noticed that many of them remain incapable of gliding through their inherited culture because they lack the essential tools— such as language and literacy abilities— to do so.

“And, they usually do not have the mentoring that is necessary to exploring and adopting elements of their American culture— ones that do not clash with their ancestral one,” she said.

In this ongoing political environment, Kassem has also noticed that these students are continuously having to authorize or quiet each other depending on their backgrounds.

“For many of them, that is not always an easy negotiation,” she said. “But, they manage. For others, it is the heart of their identity crisis.”

By Zahraa Farhat | The Arab American News | Thursday, 12.08.2016, 11:53 PM